Policy Initiatives to Support Workplace Accommodations

Project Team

Project Director: Paul M.A. Baker, Ph.D.
Co-Investigator: Nathan Moon

 

Summary / Outcome Goals

The objectives of this project are to:

Objectives will be reached by 1) review of Federal, and state (as appropriate), regulatory, legislative and policy activities; 2) the monitoring and analysis of policy and practices; and 3) development of policy options and recommendations. Analyses will cover an array of pertinent policy areas: 1) workplace and labor law and policy; 2) disability policy, including the ADA, NFI, and Sections 508, 255; 3) legal issues, professional licensure and liability, safety and standards; 4) privacy, security, and confidentiality; and 5) applicability of policy initiatives to advance universal design and improve workplace accommodations.

Project methods are divided into 4 interrelated tasks.

Progress to Date

•  Identification of key interrelated policy areas has been completed, and initial results of this research continue to be disseminated via conference presentations and paper submissions. Refinement of the key issues is in progress as part of the policy framework brief.

•  The project continues to explore and assess national, state and regional-level data sources, tracking the integration and accommodation of people with disabilities into the workplace.

•  A new policy brief on reasonable accommodations (Title 1 of the ADA ), by Lynzee Head and Paul M.A. Baker, was produced and total of sixteen newsletters on workplace accommodation have been produced and disseminated to date.

•  The project continues development of a policy framework focused on various policies influencing use of assistive technologies and universal design in workplace accommodation.

•  Workplace Accommodation Policy/Issues Curricula Development.

Paul M.A. Baker ( Lynzee Head co-lecturer) taught a graduate course, Fall 2004, �Technology, Disabilities, and the Aging: New Policy Approaches,� a revision of the Fall 2003 course �Technology, Policy, & the "Disability Divide" that addressed the application of technology in home, and workplace environments. The seminar included speakers from the Wireless, and Workplace Accommodations RERCs, as well as from other units across the Georgia Tech campus to create a cross-disciplinary environment. Several of the speakers and class members can be characterized as having some type of disability making the class particularly relevant. The project is exploring development of an online extension of the work with other Work RERC project staff. In the Spring 2005 semester Paul also supervised 3 independent studies for graduate students related to disabilities and access technology. R5 sponsored two graduate research assistants for the Summer 2005 and 2005-6 academic year.

•  Paul M.A. Baker continues to serve on the editorial board of Assistive Technology.

•  Paul M.A. Baker was named as senior editor of a forthcoming 2006 special edition of Assistive Technology Journal focusing on Disability Policy. Co-editors are Kevin Caves and Peter Blanck.

•  Paul M.A. Baker was appointed to the Blue Ribbon Panel for LMSI's ADA Impact Study for the National Council on Disability (2005).

•  Project staff continue to participate in outreach activities both internal and external to the disability community. Examples include speaking at governmental technology meetings on the need to develop accessible technologies/applications for employees and citizens, and participation at a 2005 Disability Law and Policy Network Brownbag, sponsored by the Disability Law and Policy Center of Georgia, and establishment of a working relationship with the Center for Law, Health & Society , Georgia State University College of Law

•  Paul M.A. Baker participated in a planning summit (August 2006) for the Southern Growth Policies Board Project on �Building the Next Southern Workforce,� and was a representative to the October 2006, Georgia State Policy Dialogue �Building the Next Southern Workforce Forum held in Atlanta, Georgia.

Key Findings

Thematically, the objective of ensuring that appropriate Workplace Accommodations occur appears straightforward, however as a policy research area, it poses several interesting problems. The focus on developing workplaces that can accommodate all characteristics and abilities of individual crosses a wide variety of legal, policy, technological, social, and human factors issues. From the perspective of social scientists as well as policy makers, the failure to integrate people with disabilities into the workplace has two implications. First, at the level of the disabled person, the failure often leads to diminished degree of social contacts and social support (social capital). This in turn can result in compromises to the health of the disabled person beyond purely disability related ones. Second, at the level of the community (or society) this failure often leads to a widening in the gap between those with access to social capital and those without (or having less) access to social capital. The widening of this gap, can lead to a larger, systemic breakdown of social cohesion, and a general lowering of the level of health present in the community (society). Therefore it is important to identify people with disabilities, and create public (employment and health) policies that promote their integration into the workplace (and so too into the larger communities in which the various workplaces exist). To this end, project explores approaches to the use of policy as a cross-disciplinary vehicle for achieving improved workplace conditions.

Policy Delphi

A policy Delphi was conducted by the Work RERC to identify key legislative and policy issues critical to the implementation of successful workplace accommodations and to develop policy options for addressing potential barriers.

A policy Delphi is a polling technique that seeks feedback from various stakeholders on a given issue. It is usually conducted over the course of several rounds, in which open-ended questions are also asked of the panel. Responses are then used to help develop the questions for the subsequent round. Our Policy Delphi on Workplace Accommodations took place over three rounds and involved about 45 participants representing the disability community, employers, vocational rehabilitation, and state and federal officials.

Participants in the Delphi were asked to provide input on four categories of questions.

Read the full policy Delphi report.

Selected Publications / Presentations


NIDRR

CATEA